<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Security Basics</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/#basics</link>
    <atom:link href="http://seclists.org/rss/basics.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <description>A high-volume list which permits people to ask &quot;stupid questions&quot; without being derided as &quot;n00bs&quot;.  I recommend this list to network security newbies, but be sure to read Bugtraq and other lists as well.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:30:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:30:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->

 

  <item>
    <title>RE: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/162</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Vincent Verloop on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Search for Metaspoitable. It&amp;apos;s a Virtual Machine (linux). Also look for&lt;br&gt;
Nessus.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----&lt;br&gt;
Van: listbounce () securityfocus com [&lt;a  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;mailto:listbounce&quot;&gt;mailto:listbounce&lt;/a&gt; () securityfocus com]&lt;br&gt;
Namens Bob Bobson&lt;br&gt;
Verzonden: dinsdag 22 mei 2012 23:45&lt;br&gt;
Aan: security-basics () securityfocus com&lt;br&gt;
Onderwerp: Re: locating exploits in open source&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Alternatively you can attempt to locate a version ofDamn Vulnerable Linux.&lt;br&gt;
Although it has been...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:20:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/162</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/161</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Robert Musser on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Active torrent of Damn Vulnerable Linux: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;a  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://thepiratebay.se/torrent/6519397/Damn_Vulnerable_Linux_1.5_-_Infectious_Disease&quot;&gt;https://thepiratebay.se/torrent/6519397/Damn_Vulnerable_Linux_1.5_-_Infectious_Disease&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate&lt;br&gt;
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate.  We look at how SSL works, how &lt;br&gt;
it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:59:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/161</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/160</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Bob Bobson on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Alternatively you can attempt to locate a version ofDamn Vulnerable Linux. Although it has been discontinued and most &lt;br&gt;
torrents have died by now (there are still a few seeds here and there), it remains one of my personal favorites when it &lt;br&gt;
comes to learning about vulnerabilities.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate&lt;br&gt;
In this guide we examine the...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/160</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/159</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Michał Purzyński on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Just make sure it will detect EMET specific ASLR that does differ from platform one.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It&amp;apos;s secure till it stays in the box. Against remote attacks, not physical ;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Like i said. If you want to have a full cover, you need to recompile lots of binaries, libs, etc.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yeah, you are right - people do not patch their systems. And even if they do, who tests them later? Windows &lt;br&gt;
administrators - when was the last time you have checked if MS security...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/159</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/158</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Jeffrey Walton on May 22&lt;/p&gt;EMET is a nice tool (I don&amp;apos;t hear it mentioned too often. Another neat&lt;br&gt;
one is BinScope, which allows you to examine platform security&lt;br&gt;
integration, such as ASLR and DEP.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So much for &amp;quot;Secure Out of the Box&amp;quot;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Don&amp;apos;t hold your breathe for --noexec-heap (unless its a hardend&lt;br&gt;
distribution). Checksec is a good tool to audit binaries for this.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
According to Verizon Data Breach Report, most breaches are not 0-day,&lt;br&gt;
which probably makes...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/158</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/157</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by AK on May 22&lt;/p&gt;ASLR is not your only problem under Linux. If you are using a modern&lt;br&gt;
distribution (e.g. your homebox) there are loads other protections&lt;br&gt;
enabled. Your best bet is to download an older one, turn off protections&lt;br&gt;
where needed (via proc and via linker options) and start from there.&lt;br&gt;
Userland exploitation is not beginner material with all the mitigations&lt;br&gt;
enabled.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
Securing Apache...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/157</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>RE: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/156</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by David Gillett on May 22&lt;/p&gt;amishra.jsr () gmail com [&lt;a  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;mailto:amishra.jsr&quot;&gt;mailto:amishra.jsr&lt;/a&gt; () gmail com] wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
technique. This doesn&amp;apos;t help in zero day attack. Therefore, what can be done&lt;br&gt;
to prevent zero-day attacks?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  While this is the &amp;quot;traditional&amp;quot; approach, &amp;quot;all&amp;quot; may be an overstatement.&lt;br&gt;
Several antivirus/antimalware solutions include a &amp;quot;heuristic&amp;quot; component&lt;br&gt;
which can, if not *prevent* an attack, alert you that an application&amp;apos;s&lt;br&gt;
behavior is...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/156</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/155</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by synja on May 22&lt;/p&gt;There are a few other things that *need* to be mentioned:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Make sure the asset you are protecting is worth the value of the protection.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2. If you don&amp;apos;t know what you&amp;apos;re doing, DO NOT add complexity. A poorly configured protection mechanism is just as bad &lt;br&gt;
if not worse than nothing at all.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3. The OS usually contains the tools you need already. Learn them and make sure something is missing before you add &lt;br&gt;
software.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Rob&lt;br&gt;
Sent on the...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/155</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/154</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Littlefield, Tyler on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Thanks all for the info. I really appreciated it. Luckaly I have some &lt;br&gt;
experience with asm, though it is limited. The videos are nice, though I &lt;br&gt;
am going to have to supplement them with extra materials more than &lt;br&gt;
usual, since I am blind and it&amp;apos;s hard to tell what he is doing all the time.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, again I appreciate the help. I do have a question.&lt;br&gt;
If I am going to use a buffer overflow, I want to make sure I understand &lt;br&gt;
this right.&lt;br&gt;
If I have...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:59:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/154</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/153</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Memory Vandal on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Most people think of only defensive ways to protect. One must think&lt;br&gt;
how can the system be broken offensively and fix the holes found.&lt;br&gt;
Clearly, most implementers dont have any offensive experience as they&lt;br&gt;
think only to plug holes they know of.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How about a 0day in the sandbox created to prevent a 0day scenario in&lt;br&gt;
an application? Lower user privileges? the payload would run with&lt;br&gt;
lower priviledge and still may be able to read user files (like stored...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/153</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>RE: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/152</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Jerome Athias on May 22&lt;/p&gt;try to be aware of them&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Envoyé à partir de mon Windows Phone&lt;br&gt;
De : Michał Purzyński&lt;br&gt;
Envoyé : 22/05/2012 17:20&lt;br&gt;
À : sjalex () taidri com&lt;br&gt;
Cc : synja () synfulvisions com; amishra.jsr () gmail com;&lt;br&gt;
listbounce () securityfocus com; security-basics () securityfocus com&lt;br&gt;
Objet : Re: How to prevent zero day attacks&lt;br&gt;
Are we talking about some specific systems or just generic techniques?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If generic - you&amp;apos;ve got some good answeres already. I would...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:58:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/152</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/151</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Michał Purzyński on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Are we talking about some specific systems or just generic techniques?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If generic - you&amp;apos;ve got some good answeres already. I would add - segment your networking. Assume every system will be &lt;br&gt;
owned, sooner or later - and plan for it. Local firewall is nice, but when (not if) someone will get &lt;br&gt;
&amp;quot;root/Administrator&amp;quot; access he will bypass it anyway. Inwest into good network design, think - what could i do, as the &lt;br&gt;
attacker, after...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:23:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/151</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>RE: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/150</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Mike Vella on May 22&lt;/p&gt;You may wish to take a look at assembly language. It will give you a good&lt;br&gt;
grounding in understanding why\how buffer overflows are exploited.&lt;br&gt;
It will highlight the importance of good coding practices.&lt;br&gt;
You will need to be familiar with a programming language to truly have fun&lt;br&gt;
with this.&lt;br&gt;
I wish I had more time to contribute to these forums! I could type for a&lt;br&gt;
long time about such things.&lt;br&gt;
Take a look here , someone posted it a week or two ago.....&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:59:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/150</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: locating exploits in open source</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/149</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by haZard0us on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Fuzzing is a way to find it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
Securing Apache Web Server with thawte Digital Certificate&lt;br&gt;
In this guide we examine the importance of Apache-SSL and who needs an SSL certificate.  We look at how SSL works, how &lt;br&gt;
it benefits your company and how your customers can tell if a site is secure. You will find out how to test, purchase, &lt;br&gt;
install and use a thawte Digital Certificate on...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:49:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/149</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: How to prevent zero day attacks</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/148</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Stephanus J Alex Taidri on May 22&lt;/p&gt;Seconded to Rob....&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Limit the OS to run with least privilege as possible instead of&lt;br&gt;
granting administrator access to normal user.&lt;br&gt;
This is common for Linux OS, Mac OS and Windows 7 onwards to have apps&lt;br&gt;
running with normal user privilege and required User Access Control&lt;br&gt;
(UAC) to confirmed any changes that required root/admin privilege.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Train the end-users to not simply ignore any UAC pop-up window(s), to&lt;br&gt;
read carefully and understand it well...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:44:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/basics/2012/May/148</guid>
  </item>

 

<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->
  </channel>
</rss>

