<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penetration Testing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/#pen-test</link>
    <atom:link href="http://seclists.org/rss/pen-test.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <description>While this list is intended for &quot;professionals&quot;, participants frequenly disclose techniques and strategies that would be useful to anyone with a practical interest in security and network auditing.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:15:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->

 

  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/98</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Kevin L. Shaw, CISSP, GCIH on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Derek:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&amp;quot;an hour or two&amp;quot; is not going to give you a sufficient assessment.&lt;br&gt;
Going through your 200K word dictionary a single time will probably take&lt;br&gt;
longer than that.  I would recommend a couple of things based on your&lt;br&gt;
latest note, as well as this comment - without first an enforceable&lt;br&gt;
policy in place; this is really like putting the cart before the horse.&lt;br&gt;
However; I understand the reason why you are doing this so good luck -&lt;br&gt;
but you...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/98</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Firewall Type Fingerprinting</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/97</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Zaki Akhmad on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Hello,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Can we do firewall type fingerprinting? With what tools? I want to&lt;br&gt;
know the type of the firewall in front of the web server.&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/97</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pentest lab box 16 gigs of ram</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/96</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by macubergeek on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;All&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm thinking of building a vmware target box for a pentest practice  &lt;br&gt;
lab consisting of:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
cheap Dell server with 16 gigs of ram PowerEdge T105&lt;br&gt;
vmware workstation&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My question is with the host OS.&lt;br&gt;
I was contemplating the home version of Windows 7 to give me a 64 bit  &lt;br&gt;
OS to support the amount of ram I'm planning on&lt;br&gt;
Does anyone have any experience with the latest version of VMware  &lt;br&gt;
workstation and if it will run properly on Windows 7?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
would...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:49:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/96</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/95</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Anders Thulin on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Derek Robson wrote:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  Be careful: don't fall into the all too common trap that any password that JtR&lt;br&gt;
can crack must be a weak password.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  And don't fall into the other trap that any password that contains upper and&lt;br&gt;
lower case letters, digits and spcial characters and is at least 8 characters long&lt;br&gt;
necessarily is a strong password. (This is the 'password policy' fallacy).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
  And don't assume that password strength alone is the entire truth....&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:46:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/95</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Windows Internationalization?</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/94</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Jon Kibler on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Hi,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have been approached about doing a pen test job that would involve a target&lt;br&gt;
organization whose native character set is not ASCII. So, I have a few questions&lt;br&gt;
and would appreciate some pointers to help me decide if I really want this&lt;br&gt;
assignment.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Questions that immediately come to mind are:&lt;br&gt;
1) On a Windows system that uses a non-ASCII character set (Chinese, Arabic,&lt;br&gt;
Russian, etc.), how does that effect Windows?&lt;br&gt;
   -- Are registry key names...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:43:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/94</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>VideoJak 2.0 Released</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/93</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Abhijeet Hatekar on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Sipera VIPER Lab has released VideoJak 2.0:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://videojak.sourceforge.net&quot;&gt;http://videojak.sourceforge.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
VideoJak is an IP Video security assessment tool that can target a video stream and/or video call in progress to play a &lt;br&gt;
targeted malicious video clip, resulting in a DoS.  &lt;br&gt;
Some key features of the new VideoJak:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
* IP Video Replay (as presented at ToorCon 11, DefCon 17)&lt;br&gt;
* Media Blackhole attack.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We welcome all suggestions and feedbacks.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks and Regards,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Abhijeet...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:40:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/93</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/92</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by JoePete on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;A few observations:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of the big reasons for password complexity is the ability to crack&lt;br&gt;
them offline. Essentially, password policy reflects more on the&lt;br&gt;
vulnerability of poorly secured systems (i.e. the ability to get at the&lt;br&gt;
password store) than the feeble-mindedness of employees.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If your Internet facing services (email, intranet, VPN, etc) are a&lt;br&gt;
concern, your best protection is not password complexity but account&lt;br&gt;
lockout. Without account...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:37:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/92</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: Possible Milw0rm replacement?</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/91</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by J.Hart, Elec.Eng.Tech. on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Nice.&lt;br&gt;
Yes - it is a learning experience - I never expect the code to be&lt;br&gt;
perfect - that wouldnt be any fun&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Elle&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:30:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/91</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CEH or OSCP?</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/90</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Vaibhav Kaushal on Nov 19&lt;/p&gt;Hi all,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am really interested in hacking. I know I can learn on my own but I &lt;br&gt;
would like to have a course guiding me properly rather than wandering &lt;br&gt;
here and there for some stupid material.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think C|EH is great but the OSCP is way better (I prefer being &lt;br&gt;
practical). I went through the websites of both and as far as I have &lt;br&gt;
understood, CEH is only for the professionals working in organizations. &lt;br&gt;
Since I am just an undergraduate student as of...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:06:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/90</guid>
  </item>


  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/89</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Derek Robson on Nov 17&lt;/p&gt;thanks to everyone for such a big responce.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
many of you have pointed me to questions of our policy...&lt;br&gt;
many of you have talked about haveing password quality inforced when&lt;br&gt;
they are set....&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
we have no real policy around passwords, we have no standards, we do&lt;br&gt;
no quality testing.&lt;br&gt;
we dont force users to change passwords, some have had the same&lt;br&gt;
password for many years.&lt;br&gt;
some still have the default password.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
this project is to get some real data about...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/89</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/88</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Derek Robson on Nov 17&lt;/p&gt;as per my last post....&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
we have no policy for passwords,  we plan on getting some policy and&lt;br&gt;
inforcing it.&lt;br&gt;
before we do this we want to get an overview of just how ugly things are.&lt;br&gt;
we want to get real facts about how many users are using the default password.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
in many of the meetings we have un-educated managers quoting &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot;&lt;br&gt;
that they cant know until we do this project.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
many of the IT staff are keen to get good password policy in...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/88</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/87</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Tracy Reed on Nov 17&lt;/p&gt;On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:59:29AM -0600, Harris, Michael C. spake thusly:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Probably a good idea. Especially in a big corporation where things can&lt;br&gt;
easily get out of control when the lawyers get their hands on&lt;br&gt;
things. Learn the lesson of poor Randall Schwartz and his felony&lt;br&gt;
convictions due to his work with Intel. In a smaller company (such as&lt;br&gt;
mine) I wouldn't worry so much.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Might be a bit overkill but ok... Seems like all of the servers should&lt;br&gt;
be...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:55:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/87</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/86</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by R. DuFresne on Nov 17&lt;/p&gt;Yes, this box needs to be locked down as tightly as possible.  Afterall &lt;br&gt;
that data it contains is delicate to say the least.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Secondly though, why do passwd's in this env not expire?  And why are &lt;br&gt;
there now requirements to force users to choose secure passwd's in the &lt;br&gt;
first place?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks,&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ron DuFresne&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:52:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/86</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: Possible Milw0rm replacement?</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/85</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Pedro Drimel on Nov 17&lt;/p&gt;Note that now some of the applications are available to download&lt;br&gt;
directly from their repositories which is awesome.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2009/11/17 Kevin L. Shaw, CISSP, GCIH &amp;lt;kshaw () eeenterprisesinc com&amp;gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:44:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/85</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Re: password auditing</title>
    <link>http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/84</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Posted by Haris Pilton on Nov 17&lt;/p&gt;sounds like a fun project. I would Protect it like you currently&lt;br&gt;
protect the password files you are going to brute.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br&gt;
This list is sponsored by: Information Assurance Certification Review Board&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Prove to peers and potential employers without a doubt that you can actually do a proper penetration test. IACRB CPT &lt;br&gt;
and CEPT certs require a full practical examination in order to...&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:40:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="true">http://seclists.org/pen-test/2009/Nov/84</guid>
  </item>

 

<!-- MHonArc v2.6.16 -->
  </channel>
</rss>
