mailing list archives
Re: Snort 2.9, RHEL 5 and afpacket DAQ [~Solved?]
From: Michael Altizer <maltizer () sourcefire com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:16:26 -0400
On 10/20/2010 03:14 PM, Michael Altizer wrote:
The problem is that we're running into the old kmalloc limit of 128k on
the 2.6.18 kernel supplied with RHEL5/CentOS5. The difference between
49mb and 50mb is the difference between 16218 blocks and 16549 blocks,
which the kernel attempts to kmalloc a pointer array for to keep track
of the allocated pages. On a 64-bit system:
On 10/20/2010 02:59 PM, Rich Graves wrote:
I've replicated the issue on a 64-bit CentOS 5.5 VM. It's going to
take some investigation from the kernel side of af_packet to figure
out the issue since it appears to be limited to 64-bit CentOS/RHEL as
you indicated. Unfortunately, they really don't make building a
custom kernel with their source easy, but I'm getting there...
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
I had rebuilt snort 2.8.6 with libpcap 1.1.1 and had some worse
performance than before, but then there was a discussion on one
of the snort lists regarding sids 4676 and 4677 in the
oracle-rules being a pcre "hog".
Disabling those two sids dropped my average CPU over half...
Wow. Mine dropped over 2/3.
sid 4676 is limited to POSTs, so if you have a requirement to detect
ancient oracle attacks, keep that one and drop just 4677.
The problem of the maximum 49MB buffer on RHEL5 64-bit remains (does
not affect Ubuntu 64-bit or RHEL5 32-bit; I'd expect it to effect
CentOS and other rebuilds as well), but since I'm no longer regularly
filling the buffer, my 2.9.0 installation is now stable enough that I
can start looking at the new rule options, and hope the buffer issue
gets addressed in 2.9.1.
16218 * sizeof(char *) = 129744 (< 128k)
16549 * sizeof(char *) = 132392 (> 128k)
The Linux kernel started defaulting to supporting kmallocs of
significantly larger sizes (2mb) in 2.6.22. See the AFPacket section of
the DAQ README if you're curious as to the math involved with
determining the number of blocks (pages) requested.
There are a few avenues that can be explored:
1. Change the AFPacket DAQ module to attempt to use initially use
multi-page blocks and scale back the block size on subsequent allocation
2. Upgrade your kernel to something a bit more recent (2.6.22 came out
almost 3 and a half years ago).
3. Change the af_packet.c on your RHEL kernel to use vmalloc instead of
kmalloc for the page vector and recompile, but that will have an unknown
impact on performance.
I'll start looking into option 1 (probably the best option overall) when
I get some time.
Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
Snort-users list archive:
Re: Snort 2.9, RHEL 5 and afpacket DAQ Rich Graves (Oct 20)
Re: Snort 2.9, RHEL 5 and afpacket DAQ Jeff Kell (Oct 20)
Re: Snort 2.9, RHEL 5 and afpacket DAQ [~Solved?] Ralf Spenneberg (Oct 22)
Re: Snort 2.9, RHEL 5 and afpacket DAQ [~Solved?] Jason Haar (Oct 21)
- Re: Snort 2.9, RHEL 5 and afpacket DAQ, (continued)