Home page logo
/

snort logo Snort mailing list archives

Re: Poor performance with Snort 2.9.4.6 under OpenBSD 5.3
From: Markus Lude <markus.lude () gmx de>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:29:19 +0200

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:38:01PM -0400, Joel Esler wrote:
Package maintainers would benefit everyone by submitting their
packages upstream.  For years, our recommendation was to build, the
packages were so far behind.  

submitting packages may make sense for linux. I don't see any benefit
why they should be available in different places than other packages.

Speaking of far behind: the only OpenBSD release for which the so_rules
from VRT come precomiled is one which isn't supported for more than 2
years now.

Keeping the package maintainers up to date has helped a bit  I see
things being updated more. 

IMO things that would help:
- support snort releases for at least 6 months, better 9 or 12? With
  support I mean make up-to-date rules available for them.
  As mentioned above you see how hard it is for you to keep up even
  with releases each 6 months.
- help maintainers to get their packages tested. Test reports are rare.
  At least there aren't those different output plugins / backend any
  more to test. That was quite a lot, especially with multiple archs.

Regards,
Markus


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Snort-users mailing list
Snort-users () lists sourceforge net
Go to this URL to change user options or unsubscribe:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-users
Snort-users list archive:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-users

Please visit http://blog.snort.org to stay current on all the latest Snort news!


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault