Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Vulnerability Development: Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - exploitable

Re: ssh-1.2.27 remote buffer overflow - exploitable

From: Jochen Bauer <jtb_at_THEO2.PHYSIK.UNI-STUTTGART.DE>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 12:42:16 +0100

On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 01:48:53AM -0000, Frank wrote:
> This is submitted to the Freebsd bug tracking system, although there are
> doubtless other vendors who leave this package, despite the existence of
> the ssh-2.X. While Debian appears to be immune, I was able to crash my
> ssh daemon (much to my dismay), and there appears the potential to
> execute arbitrary code, as long as you encrypt it first...
>
> Here is the freebsd report.. it describes the method to crash a remote Ssh daemon (lets hope you ran sshd from your xinetd, etc).
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14749

I've taken a closer look at the problem. Here's my analysis:

In sshd.c, around line 1513 the client-generated session key,
that has been encrypted with the server and host public keys,
is received from the client as a multiple precision integer.

/* Get the encrypted integer. */
  mpz_init(&session_key_int);
  packet_get_mp_int(&session_key_int);

The encrypted session key is then (around line 1525) passed
to rsa_private_decrypt to do the first part of the decryption,
which is either decryption using the server private key or
decryption using the host private key, depending on which key
has the larger modulus.

rsa_private_decrypt(&session_key_int, &session_key_int,
                          &sensitive_data.private_key);

If RSAREF is used (i.e. RSAREF is defined in the code), the
rsa_private_decrypt function in rsaglue.c (around line 162)
looks like:

void rsa_private_decrypt(MP_INT *output, MP_INT *input, RSAPrivateKey *key)
{
  unsigned char input_data[MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN];
  unsigned char output_data[MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN]
  unsigned int input_len, output_len, input_bits;
  [...]
  input_bits = mpz_sizeinbase(input, 2);
  input_len = (input_bits + 7) / 8;
  gmp_to_rsaref(input_data, input_len, input);
  [...]
}

The trouble spot is the fixed length buffer
input_data[MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN]. A pointer to this buffer is
passed to the conversion function gmp_to_rsaref along with a
pointer to the encrypted session key and the length (input_len)
of the encrypted session key, which may be greater than
[MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN]. gmp_to_rsaref (located around line 79 of
rsaglue.c) simply calls mp_linearize_msb_first(buf, len, value).

void gmp_to_rsaref(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len, MP_INT *value)
{
  mp_linearize_msb_first(buf, len, value);
}

mp_linearize_msb_first is contained in mpaux.c around line 41.
The function looks like:

void mp_linearize_msb_first(unsigned char *buf, unsigned int len,
                            MP_INT *value)
{
  unsigned int i;
  MP_INT aux;
  mpz_init_set(&aux, value);
  for (i = len; i >= 4; i -= 4) <-------
    {
      unsigned long limb = mpz_get_ui(&aux);
      PUT_32BIT(buf + i - 4, limb); <-------
      mpz_div_2exp(&aux, &aux, 32);
    }
  [...]
}
    
There's the overflow! len is the length of the encrypted session
key, while buf is a pointer to the fixed length buffer
input_data[MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN] and no check wether len is
greater than MAX_RSA_MODULUS_LEN is performed. The fix should be
obvious!

About the possible exploit:

In this particular overflow, the encrypted, client generated session
key has to be taken as the exploit buffer. I.e. the shellcode, NOPs
and jump address has to sent to the server instead of the encrypted
session key. To make that clear: The shellcode, NOPs and jump address
don't have to be encrypted as they are taken as the ENCRYPTED session
key.

However, the data that is finally written into the buffer are the
limbs of the multiple precision integer that session_key_int is
assumed to be. The exploit buffer code therefore must be converted
into a multiple precision integer, which upon extraction of the limbs
into the buffer yields the correct exploit buffer code. The best way
would probably be to start from the exploit buffer as it should finally
be to overflow the target buffer and use the functions of the GNU
multiple precision integer library to reverse the procedure happening
to the encrypted session key in the sshd code step be step, leading to
the exploit buffer that has to be sent instead of the encrypted session
key.

That may be difficult, be it think it's possible.

-- 
Jochen Bauer
************************************************************
*Network Security Team                                     *
*Computer Center of the University of Stuttgart            *
*Germany                                                   *
*                                                          *
*Email: jtb_at_theo2.physik.uni-stuttgart.de                  *
*       jochen.bauer_at_rus.uni-stuttgart.de                  *
*                                                          *
*PGP Public Key:                                           *
*   http://www.theo2.physik.uni-stuttgart.de/jtb/jtb.html  *
************************************************************ 
<!-- attachment="bin0a02906" -->
<HR>
<UL>
<LI>application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
</UL>
Received on Nov 09 1999
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos