Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Vulnerability Development: Re: BitchX /ignore bug

Re: BitchX /ignore bug

From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar_at_THIEVCO.COM>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 17:50:49 -0700

Rick Jansen wrote:
>
> I don't know whether this is the right place to put it, but i'm going to
> anyway :)

Yup, and probably Bugtraq, too.

>
> Because of a simple /invite nickname #%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s, BitchX will
> segfault and coredump. This is a small programming error, you can find a
> patch at this location:
> http://root66.org/karin/BitchX-bug-patch-3-juli-2000.tar.gz by Frank van
> Vliet, alias {}.

The subject: line says /ignore, I assume this problem only occurs
with /invite? (I don't use IRC much. /ignore wouldn't send
anything to the ignored party, would it?)

As a general question for vuln-dev:

I've seen a number of these print string vulnerabilities pop up
lately. I gather that the programmer writes their printf or equiv
wrong, and these attacks are getting interpreted as formatting strings
somehow.

Can someone explain to me what goes on on a stack level? Are these
exploitable (pushing code) instead of just crashing?

                                        BB
Received on Jul 04 2000

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos