Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Vulnerability Development: Re: (pointless?) overflow in tftp.exe (Was: Re: twlc advisory: possible overflow in ms ftp client)

Re: (pointless?) overflow in tftp.exe (Was: Re: twlc advisory: possible overflow in ms ftp client)

From: <supergate_at_twlc.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 15:33:24 +0100

----- Original Message -----
From: <foob_at_return0.net>
To: <supergate_at_twlc.net>
Cc: <vuln-dev_at_securityfocus.com>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:36 AM
Subject: (pointless?) overflow in tftp.exe (Was: Re: twlc advisory: possible
overflow in ms ftp client)

> (excuse the formatting, damn cmd.exe cut n paste sucks).
>
> "The instruction at "0x........" referenced memory at "0x41414141".
>
> Maybe a heap overflow. Probably usable to run code. Pointless-factor-10.
> As far as i can tell, the remote server doesnt need to exist - it crashes
> before the network is used.

i made some test sending string from the server to the client and
nothing.... so i guess its more useless than before

> One possible non-pointless use of such client overflows could be if you
> can remotely run commands on a machine, say through IIS, but not
> upload code. You could use this with some payload to execute
> arbitrary code. Probably.

yes this is obiuvsly possible

supergate.
Received on Nov 02 2001

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos