|
Vulnerability Development
mailing list archives
Re: Possible syslogd DoS ?
From: White Vampire <whitevampire () mindless com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:57:06 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 04:10:54PM +0200, Pavel Kankovsky(peak () argo troja mff cuni cz) wrote:
1. limit access to the socket to selected subjects (e.g.
chgrp sysloggers /dev/log; chmod o= /dev/log, and run all daemons
with (supplementary) gid sysloggers)
By outright disabling 006 on the device what common daemons
would it affect in the long right?
Regards,
- --
\ | \ / White Vampire\Rem | http://gammaforce.org/
\|\| \/ whitevampire () mindless com | http://gammagear.com/
"Silly hacker, root is for administrators." | http://webfringe.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE7vLEC3+rxmnEDyl8RApVFAJ4mqtvJjinVccdQxUYFX8D+VfIzVQCaAg9x
/bQh0EKPfHlN9T8VpYu8mZg=
=W+VI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: Possible syslogd DoS ?, (continued)
Re: Possible syslogd DoS ? Pavel Kankovsky (Oct 04)
RE: Possible syslogd DoS ? Brian McKinney (Oct 04)
|