Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Vulnerability Development: Re: Quick SNMP Payload Structure Question

Re: Quick SNMP Payload Structure Question

From: <Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 00:56:29 -0500

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 05:46:09 GMT, Eric Brandwine said:

> This is a well documented (if somewhat dense) standard. Go to the
> official docs, rather than trying to reverse engineer it. I've read
> the docs, and you'll never figure it out. There's some odd stuff in
> BER. That's why so many vendors have so much trouble decoding it
> safely.

How many vendors tried to implement BER and related stuff without reading
the 'Implementors Workshop' documents (or whatever they called the errata and
explanations and "We've decided to read the unclear standard THIS way" stuff)?

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mar 05 2002
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos