|
Vulnerability Development
mailing list archives
Re: OT? Are chroots immune to buffer overflows?
From: Andreas Ferber <aferber () techfak uni-bielefeld de>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:31:12 +0200
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:48:16PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
Most buffer overflows I've seen attempt to infiltrate the system enough to
run /bin/sh. In chroot'ed environments, /bin/sh doesn't (shouldn't!) exist -
so they fail.
Is it as simple as that? As 99.999% of the system binaries aren't available
in the jail, can a buffer overflow ever work?
The buffer overflow still works as expected (the bug is in the daemon,
not in /bin/sh), though the shellcode used in most precooked exploits
doesn't work. If the buffer is large enough so that the attacker can
place more code than just an exec("/bin/sh") into it, he can still do
all nasty things inside the bounds of the jail (e.g. uploading his own
shell and executing that one ;-)
Andreas
--
Andreas Ferber - dev/consulting GmbH - Bielefeld, FRG
---------------------------------------------------------
+49 521 1365800 - af () devcon net - www.devcon.net
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: OT? Are chroots immune to buffer overflows?, (continued)
|