Vulnerability Development: RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks

["Jason Coombs" <jasonc () science org>]

mstask.exe is not running on this box.

Task Scheduler service is set to Manual.

Any other ideas?

Thanks.

Jason Coombs
jasonc () science org

-----Original Message-----
From: Aditya [mailto:adityald2 () gmx net]
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:18 PM
To: jasonc () science org; vuln-dev () security-focus com
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks


sorry about the mistake about the DCOM - the good thing is already you have
disabled that

for 1025 - you have to disable the schduler service "mstask.exe"

for 1027 its dcom


-aditya


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Coombs" <jasonc () science org>
To: "Aditya" <adityald2 () gmx net>; <vuln-dev () security-focus com>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 8:33 AM
Subject: RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks


> DCOM is already disabled and all transports are removed from the list in
> DCOMCNFG.EXE.
>
> System still binds to 1025 TCP.
>
> Are you sure this is all you did to stop this port binding on your box?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jason Coombs
> jasonc () science org
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aditya [mailto:adityald2 () gmx net]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:47 AM
> To: jasonc () science org; vuln-dev () security-focus com
> Subject: Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks
>
>
> the 1025 port is bound because the machine in win2k which has com enabled
by
> default
>
> disable com and this will vanish
>
> aditya
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jason Coombs" <jasonc () science org>
> To: <vuln-dev () security-focus com>
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:10 AM
> Subject: RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks
>
>
> > However, port 1025 is still being bound by SYSTEM ... I have no idea
why.
> >