Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



WebApp Sec: Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent

Re: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent

From: Matt Kenigson <president_at_sheergenius.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 11:28:27 -0600

A.D. Douma wrote:

>Would appear we all are a bit to late. And besides, there is always the
>hacker and open source community we can rely on to publish the tools needed.
>Sanctum will not spend $$ on civil suits unless they feel threatened.
>
>
If patent law is like copyright law (which it may not be), then Sanctum
will have to defend their patent against any and all infringers if they
want to maintain the patent.

Again, I don't know if that is true but if it is, the broad nature of
who they would have to sue alone would make the patent useless other
than for show to investors. It would be prohibitively expensive if
Sanctum were to pursue all of those lawsuits. That is, assuming the
first one didn't scare everyone off (I don't think it would).
Received on Jan 17 2004

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]