Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



WebApp Sec: RE: Sanctum Patent Thread

RE: Sanctum Patent Thread

From: Thor Larholm <thor_at_pivx.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:26:44 -0800

If you feel like discussiong the legal issues surrounding security research,
I created a mailing list called SecLegal for this purpose. To subscribe,
either visit

http://lists.jscript.dk/mailman/listinfo/seclegal_lists.jscript.dk

Or send a subscribe request to seclegal-request_at_lists.jscript.dk

Regards

Thor Larholm
Senior Security Researcher
PivX Solutions
24 Corporate Plaza #180
Newport Beach, CA 92660
http://www.pivx.com
thor_at_pivx.com
949-231-8496

PivX defines "Proactive Threat Mitigation". Get a FREE Beta Version of
Qwik-Fix
<http://www.qwik-fix.net>

-----Original Message-----
From: lakewood1_at_copper.net [mailto:lakewood1_at_copper.net]
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2004 6:50 PM
To: mark_at_curphey.com
Cc: webappsec_at_securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Sanctum Patent Thread

Hi Mark,

There should be a list for legal issues that includes security-related
issues. Then other lists can register
to be notified of significant-to-general postings on that list. The
legal list will be quite big but this will
focus and coordinate such issues.

The main advantage is that other lists, like this one, that are affected
by parallel issues will have
notice and can act accordingly. An additional level of complexity but
one that can publish significant
notices.

Regards!

-Thomas Clark

Mark Curphey wrote:

>Guys,
>
>This is clearly a really important issue for the web security industry
>and the people that subscribe to this list. However (and correct me if
>I am wrong here) we are in danger of venturing into topics that are
>more related to patent law and speculation than web security issues.
>
>I am going to close this thread down mid-night Monday unless of-course
>your post adds significant new value.
>
>Hopefully there will be a good summary post between now and then and
>someone proposes a good plan of action for the concerned community !
>
>Mark
>
>
>
Received on Jan 20 2004

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos