In which case would 'prior art' relating to individual sections of the
patent still be relevant?
Glyn.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pentester2189114_at_hushmail.com
> [mailto:pentester2189114_at_hushmail.com]
> Sent: 21 January 2004 05:08
> To: sullo_at_cirt.net
> Cc: mark_at_curphey.com; webappsec_at_securityfocus.com
> Subject: RE: Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology Patent
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 08:16:45 -0800 sullo_at_cirt.net wrote:
> >Does that mean, therefore, that they cannot encorce their patent
> >against products or methodologies that only use a portion of
> what the
> >patent covers?
> >
> No, it does not. Sanctum can enforce their ownership rights
> against anyone that infringes on any single or combination of
> claims in the patent if they choose to do so.
>
>
>
> Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
> FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
>
> Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
> https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?> subloc=messenger&l=434
>
>
> Promote security and make money with
> the Hushmail Affiliate Program:
> https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427
>
Received on Jan 21 2004
Intro
