Home page logo

webappsec logo WebApp Sec mailing list archives

Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics
From: "wirepair" <wirepair () roguemail net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 05:19:03 -0800

Good point,
One problem, the developers that make these mistakes/don't code properly are ALREADY LAZY. Otherwise we wouldn't have this insane amount of a problem to begin with. Or they were just never taught to code securely which is more likely the case... The fact that they are using this product most likely *will*
make them think about security. And if they don't, as they say, this product will protect against 70%
of common mistakes. (uhm that 30% kinda worries me but at least they are being realistic :D). I also
like the idea of OWASP doing something like you mentioned but uhm, who are we to tell them what to do :D.

So basically, if they programmers are lazy this will protect them in some sense. If they aren't, it's a nice
tool to augment their code and hopefully reduce the risk of mistakes being made.
just my thoughts...

On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:46:32 -0300
 Mads Rasmussen <mads () opencs com br> wrote:
Mark Curphey wrote:
Here I am, depressed at the prospect of filling in mountains of expense
claims from weeks of traveling and approving mundane mails to webappsec
about XSS after XSS and along comes a shining light. At last an "application
security" company that gets it ! Hats of to the folks at SPI and the Curphey
Award for 2004 for leading the industry down the right path !


Here is another link http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617901,00.asp

I don't know about you guys but I have a bad feeling about this. I am not sure this is the right path.

The article quotes Caleb Sima, founder and chief technology officer of SPI Dynamics saying "It doesn't require developers to learn about security," - "You really just need to validate input to eliminate most application vulnerabilities."

Shouldn't you at least have a feeling for where the developers makes their mistakes to be able to insert the right piece of secure code?

By all means it looks like a cool product, but how much can we trust it?

One of its features is, qoute
"Input Validation objects will check incoming data on web forms to
validate user-supplied input against a set of rules and prevent
parameter manipulation exploits, such as SQL Injection attacks."

Can we trust these "set of rules".
If they opened their technology, the OWASP team could contribute rules to such a database and then we just might get somewhere by having a list of f.ex regular expressions for using the validator classes in .Net or input validation in general but that would probably not happen.

I am concerned that products like this just leads to lazy developers.

Jeff what do you think about this? You wanted to start an input validation project based on filters, a database like described above would be quite handy :o)

Just my two bits

Mads Rasmussen, M.Sc.
Open Communications Security
+55 11 3345 2525

Visit Things From Another World for the best
comics, movies, toys, collectibles and more.

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]