Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



WebApp Sec: Re: Securing encrypted data in RAM vs MSSQL

Re: Securing encrypted data in RAM vs MSSQL

From: Ivan Krstic <krstic_at_fas.harvard.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 02:06:52 +0100

Lucas Holt wrote:
> [...] When the power goes out, you lose the
> data if its in ram. [...]

Yes and no, depending on how much you want to nitpick. See Gutmann's
classic "Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory"
[1] for a thorough treatment. Also good are sections 9.3.1-9.3.4 in
Ferguson, Schneier, "Practical Cryptography" (Indianapolis, Wiley
Publishing, 2003).

Usually, this is of no concern, but if one's dealing with particularly
sensitive information, it becomes vital to keep in mind memory is *not*
safe. If one really insists of keeping very important things (keys, etc)
in memory safely, the only solution I'm aware of is the use of a Boojum,
as mentioned by Ferguson, Schneier [2].

[1] http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html
[2] Crescenzo, Ferguson, Impagliazzo, Jakobsson. "How to Forget a
Secret". In Meinel, Tisson, editors, STACS 99, vol. 1563 of "Lecture
Notes in Computer Science", pp. 500-509. Springer Verlag, 1999.

Cheers,
Ivan.
Received on Jul 07 2004

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]