Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




webappsec logo WebApp Sec mailing list archives

Re: OWASP Top Ten - dev process
From: Devdas Bhagat <devdas () dvb homelinux org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:48:38 +0530

On 13/07/05 11:40 +1000, Michael Silk wrote:

But isn't the the _whole point_ of a "Top Ten" is that it quickly and
easily lists the 'visible' problems [i.e not the cause]?

I mean, you could make it a Top 2 otherwise:
1) Bad Programming
2) Bad Design

Top Three:
3> Bad Programmers.

...

It covers everything; easy to interpret and hence fail or pass as you like.

imho an OWASP "Top Ten" shouldn't really cover _my_ development
procedures; only the problems exposed by them.

IMHO, we need a top ten problems and a top ten bad practices list.
That would help a lot more.

Devdas Bhagat


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]