|
WebApp Sec
mailing list archives
Re: [WEB SECURITY] The Möbius Defense, th e end of Defense in Depth
From: Pete Herzog <lists () isecom org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:45:38 +0200
Walt,
One question- if the definition has shifted- why hasn't anyone updated
any of the definitions in all the books, courses, and websites?
It's a failure on our part to change the definition in practice and
still refer to it academically as something else (layered security,
multiple layers, etc.). So maybe it has changed with the times but
whether you go with the military or the common definitions of all the
print and on-line resources, your new definition doesn't fit to the
old. It's time we start letting the others know that the old one no
longer applies. That's one thing we did in the presentation. But
again, that's just one part of the Möbius Defense. There are more
improvements based on current research that we also added.
Sincerely,
-pete.
Pete,
I think what you will find as you take your presentation into the
information security community is that when most of us speak or work
to implement DiD, we are doing what you call the Möbius defense.
You are working with the military definition, but in the business
world the definition of DiD has shifted.
To myself and those colleagues that I've discussed your ideas and
presentations with, Did=Möbius.
Thanks!
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: [WEB SECURITY] The Möbius Defense, th e end of Defense in Depth Pete Herzog (Jul 09)
|