Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Extending Randpkt Protocol Coverage
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:34:51 -0400

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sonny Tavernier
<sonny.tavernier () gmail com> wrote:
Hi Evan,

I worked on a proposal for the project "Improved Fuzzing": an improved
fuzzing function which aims to improve the efficiency and the coverage of
the tests.

The more the input trace files are diverse and varied, the more it will be
effective, so it seems your idea is complementary to my proposal.

I'm wondering if you could comment on my proposal so we could improve it

Here is the link : http://hacknowledge.lescigales.org/proposal/

I'm not familiar with PIN but I from your proposal I understand it's
something like the valgrind framework? The idea is certainly an
interesting one, though if my understanding is correct it sounds like
an awful lot of work for one summer - I could be wrong though.

Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]