Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-dev] GSOC ideas: protocol buffers dissecto r andFileshark
From: okordy <okordy () o2 pl>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:05:49 +0200

Dnia 18 kwietnia 2013 17:56 Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> napisaƂ(a):
...except in those places where the UI *should* be different.  For example, when showing a JPEG, Wireshark doesn't 
have multiple items in the "packet list" pane, because the JPEG is in, for example, a single HTTP message.  However, 
in Fileshark, the dissector might want to have separate items in the list pane for different parts of the JPEG file.

Of course, yes. But some components doesn't need to be reimplemented (for example, hex browser).

I think it would be reasonable to make it possible to use the same dissectors as for Wireshark

Yes, that's a lot of the point of Fileshark.

I just wanted to emphasize this.

Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]