mailing list archives
tshark -G fields2
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:25:38 +0000 (UTC)
Is there any reason to keep "-G fields2" since field 8 (blurb) is redundant
with field 6 (also blurb) and we have "-G fields3", which does not contain
any redundant information?
I propose either:
1) Eliminating the current "-G fields2", then renaming "-G fields3" to the
new "-G fields2" so that we would only have 2 reports, "-G fields" and "-G
2) Just adding the 2 extra fields from the current "-G fields3" report to
the "-G fields" report and eliminating both "-G fields2" and "-G fields3"
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
- tshark -G fields2 Christopher Maynard (Apr 04)