Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

tshark -G fields2
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:25:38 +0000 (UTC)

Is there any reason to keep "-G fields2" since field 8 (blurb) is redundant
with field 6 (also blurb) and we have "-G fields3", which does not contain
any redundant information?

I propose either:
1) Eliminating the current "-G fields2", then renaming "-G fields3" to the
new "-G fields2" so that we would only have 2 reports, "-G fields" and "-G
fields2", or

2) Just adding the 2 extra fields from the current "-G fields3" report to
the "-G fields" report and eliminating both "-G fields2" and "-G fields3"

- Chris
Ref: http://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/tshark.html

Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]