Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Filebacked-tvbuffs : GSoC'13
From: Ambarisha B <b.ambarisha () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 02:43:48 +0530

Hi Anders,

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:05 AM, Anders Broman <a.broman () bredband net>wrote:

 Not necessarily if we can hide the fact in the tvb or reassembly

But the dissectors create the tvb from the reassembled data. So, if we
define a new type of tvbuff which has to be used, wouldn't that effect the

I think the first step is to find out how feasible this idea is and an
implementation strategy. gziped files, encrypted files etc may prove the
idea not valid.

I understand that feasibility could be a concern in the sense that "we cut
down memory usage without *any* loss in performance* because that would
depend on how well we can tune the cache. I was thinking that the file
backing the tvbuff would be a separate file and not the capture file. In
that case, encryption and compression of capture file wouldn't matter. Am I
missing something here?

Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]