Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: PIM dissector
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 11:31:11 -0700


On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:17 AM, Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl> wrote:

As this part of the PIM message isn't intended for the PIM entities themselves,
but uses the PIM protocol to carry the message across, the carried payload (IPv4
or IPv6 in this case) will be put onto a section of the destination network.
Therefore this is an independent part of the PIM message. IMHO, it should go in
the main tree.

Yeah, as with other tunneling protocols, it's transporting packets towards an ultimate receiver; whether the protocol 
layers atop the payload happen to include a network-layer protocol doesn't matter here.

As an example of such a payload which should not be on the main tree look at
ICMP. There the header is part of the message and not destined other than the
receiving ICMP entity.

Exactly.  ICMP isn't expecting the receiver of the ICMP packet to deliver it to a local IP stack as an incoming packet 
or to strip the ICMP header off and send the payload on, it's expecting the receiver to possibly look at the header and 
deliver an error notification to whoever sent the packet.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]