Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Request for submission
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:25:25 +0200


Who has time to review this 100kB patch?


On 04/09/2013 03:00 PM, Roland Knall wrote:

Could I please bump my request one more time on the buglist? I am
starting to work on some topics for new features on the dissector, and
only want to really start it, as soon as the existing patch went

kind regards,

On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:

Could I please kindly ask some of the main developers to commit the
patch in  https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8505 ?
Evan Huus, who kindly lend me an ear in getting the patch ready is
busy at the moment with exams, but has already cleared the patch.

All there is left to do would be to submit the patch.

It needs a once-over, as I haven't really looked at it since it was
rewritten to use TVBs, but most of what was in the first patch made
sense so it's probably fine.

I'm also in a theatre production starting next week. I don't know why
I thought lining that up with my exams was a good idea, but there you
go :P

(Which is to say: I'm going to be very scarce here for a while.)


Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]