Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Display filter and/or precedence
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 19:38:24 +0000 (UTC)

Evan Huus <eapache ()    > writes:

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Gerald Combs <gerald ()    > wrote:
Laura Chappell and Sean Walberg recently discovered that logical OR
takes precedence over logical AND in display filters. Is there any
reason we shouldn't reverse this so that we match the order of
operations elsewhere (including BPF)?

Ref: https://twitter.com/LauraChappell/status/365250041453109248/photo/1
Download book supplements (i.e., http-wiresharkorg.pcapng) from
http://wiresharkbook.com/wireshark101.html

The fact they had to *discover* this is probably indicative of
something, but +1 for being consistent with the rest of the world.

+1 for consistency.

Should we add a bitwise OR as well?

Until now I didn't even know we had bitwise AND, but I think it makes sense :)

For bitwise ops, there are also ^ and ~
Then there's even other ops like *, /, %, +, and -


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]