Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Fuzz-bot Valgrind
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 14:01:54 -0400

However, looking more closely at the times: there is *no way* given the
size of our menagerie, that it should be valgrinding the entire thing in
under half an hour (

I added another tweak in 51300 that might give a clue what's going on.
Gerald, is it possible that valgrind isn't in the PATH or doesn't have
execute permission for the fuzz-bot's environment/user? Something like that
might explain the 1/2-hour time, since then valgrind would never be run at

On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

Well, at least it seems to be running correctly with and without tree now.
Part of r50895 probably fixed it by accident somehow...

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

I'm coming to the conclusion that it isn't working at all, even apart
from the weird only-one-set-of-arguments bug that we never tracked
down. I just grabbed a chunk of the menagerie and ran fuzz-test -g on
it myself and I'm finding way too many errors for this to be just me
getting lucky.

This suggests, however, that if we were to fix it we would be flooded
in fuzz failures...


Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]