mailing list archives
Re: Interesting thing about "recent" changes in GHashTable
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 18:52:22 +0200
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:15:28PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote:
Not worth it in my opinion unless the memory savings are significant (I
suspect they are only in the range of a few-hundred KB).
Yes, something like this.
Exact numbers for few:
proto_names 21KB 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
registered_dissectors 8KB 41 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
eth_hashtable 6KB 51 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
manuf_hashtable 262KB 64 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
sub_dissectors 40KB 46 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
338 KB in total.
(test patches: http://www.wireshark.org/~darkjames/ghashtable-set/)
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe