Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Memory consumption in tshark
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:21:08 -0400

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Dario Lombardo <dario.lombardo.ml () gmail com
wrote:

On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

Also, just as a useful reference point: if you run your normal tshark
command (no valgrind) on the 1GB subset, what does memory usage of the
process peak at?


It uses about 1,5GB of memory.

With the env vars you asked me to export, tshark can't run on the 1GB pcap
file. I've reduced the dataset to 2 millions of pkts, and that's the output.


That's quite useful actually: it looks like the majority of the memory is
being used to store address-resolution data from all of the DNS packets so
that if those IP addresses show up later we can resolve them immediately
(without having to ask the system name resolver).

It doesn't look like there's a way to disable this at the moment (I believe
we still store the names even if name resolution is disabled), but it
should be easy enough to fix. The add_ipv4_name and add_ipv6_name functions
should probably be no-ops if all name resolution is disabled. Then simply
passing the -n flag will greatly reduce your memory usage (though it won't
yet).

If nobody has any objections or better ideas I will probably fix this on
the weekend.

Cheers,
Evan
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]