mailing list archives
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:57:00 +0100
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 02:23:54PM -0500, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
Is proto_field_is_references still a valid function?
In looking at the intent, it either looks completely useless or should be used on almost all dissectors.
My old mail about proto_field_is_references()
I think 3/ is already fixed.
1 & 2 are still an issue.
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
- Re: proto_field_is_referenced Jakub Zawadzki (Dec 18)