Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: proto_field_is_referenced
From: Jakub Zawadzki <darkjames-ws () darkjames pl>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:57:00 +0100

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 02:23:54PM -0500, mmann78 () netscape net wrote:
Is proto_field_is_references still a valid function?

In looking at the intent, it either looks completely useless or should be used on almost all dissectors.

My old mail about proto_field_is_references()
  http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201205/msg00028.html

I think 3/ is already fixed.

1 & 2 are still an issue.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Re: proto_field_is_referenced Jakub Zawadzki (Dec 18)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault