Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Wmem has reached feature-parity with emem
From: Michal Labedzki <michal.labedzki () tieto com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:26:58 +0200

On 19 June 2013 20:52, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

        wmem_tree_t *sub_tree = (wmem_tree_t *)
wmem_tree_lookup32_array(cid_to_psm_table, key);
        if (sub_tree) {
                psm_data = (psm_data_t *)
wmem_tree_lookup32_le(sub_tree, pinfo->fd->num);
        }


Great. Why did not I think of that? :) Thanks.

You can also check
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8824where I try to
switch to wmem tree in Bluetooth dissectors.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]