Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Proposed Gerrit workflow (was: Re: Notes from Sharkfest '13)
From: Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:08:32 +0200

Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (balint () balintreczey hu):

I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
Please check it and share your opinion.

would that mean that even the most basic change needs peer review and
approval based on the process defined by gerrit?

I'm a bit worried that this doubles the time for such simple changes.  I
often see this in corporate environments where people don't correct
typos, misleading variable names, formatting etc. because they can't be
bothered with the administrative overhead.

Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]