mailing list archives
Re: Proposed Gerrit workflow (was: Re: Notes from Sharkfest '13)
From: Martin Kaiser <lists () kaiser cx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 17:08:32 +0200
Thus wrote Bálint Réczey (balint () balintreczey hu):
I have started describing a Gerrit based workflow which IMO would fit
to the project at http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow .
Please check it and share your opinion.
would that mean that even the most basic change needs peer review and
approval based on the process defined by gerrit?
I'm a bit worried that this doubles the time for such simple changes. I
often see this in corporate environments where people don't correct
typos, misleading variable names, formatting etc. because they can't be
bothered with the administrative overhead.
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe