Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Checksum filterable fields
From: Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC)

Christopher Maynard <Christopher.Maynard ()    > writes:

Removing the bad_checksums does have at least 1 drawback though, and that's
that several of them are used in default coloring rules, so if they're
removed, users will likely end up with several warnings of the form:

Warn Could not compile color filter "Checksum Errors" from saved filters:
"<protocol>.checksum_bad" is neither a field nor a protocol name.

I suppose in order to avoid that, the <protocol>.checksum_good's could be
removed instead of the <protocol>.checksum_bad's, since none of those are
used in any of the default coloring rules.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault