Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 53619: /trunk/ /trunk/: NEWS
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:47:34 +0100

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:01:52AM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote:
Thus wrote Guy Harris (guy () alum mit edu):

On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:09 PM, jmayer () wireshark org wrote:


User: jmayer
Date: 2013/11/27 11:09 PM

Having a generated file in the source tree is not fun.

Should we add a top-level rule to make it, and remove it from SVN?


Last time I added a protocol and modified release-notes.asciidoc, I
couldn't figure out if/how I should update NEWS.

cd docbook
make release_notes

cd docbook
make release_notes

OK, so they are identical. Main "problem" are the required tools, but
developers should be able to live with reading
docbook/release-notes.asciidoc instead of NEWS.

How about removing the NEWS file and "just" making sure that it is
generated for packaging?

Once that is done we can move to the asn1/ stuff - which should then be
moved to epan/dissectors/asn1/ ;-)

Joerg Mayer                                           <jmayer () loplof de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]