Home page logo

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Clang code analysis buildbot
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 14:31:27 -0700

On Mar 21, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com> wrote:

How long does the clang code analysis buldbot

You mean the "beat the living hell out of Wireshark to look for bugs in many different ways" buildbot? :-)

run usually take?

If successful, a loooong time.  If we look at, for example, build 2646:


its testing steps were:

        scan-build, running the Clang static analyzer - this took 30:18;
        cov-build, building to prepare to hand Wireshark off to Coverity - this took 9:59;
        fuzz-menagerie, repeatedly running fuzzed capture files through TShark to make sure it doesn't crash - this 
took 1:15:03, and would have taken longer had it not failed.

Perhaps you slowed it down by trying to fix the 802.11 dissector crash; now it's going to have to go through the 
*entire* series of fuzz tests. :-)
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]