Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Can we move to Lua 5.2.3 only?
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan () oracle com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:18:01 -0400


On Mar 31, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com> wrote:

Do you mean Wireshark would no longer compile/run if the Lua version was < 5.2?

Yes, that would be the ultimate goal.  That way someone writing a Lua script and wants to share it with others doesn't 
have to worry about whether it will work for others or not. Lua 5.2 includes new built-in functions and lexical tokens 
that 5.1 did not, so writing one with 5.2 might not work if someone else uses 5.1.

And of course it would be nice to get rid of the C-code that has to deal with both as well, and not have to test on 
both.


In that case I'd vote no: Redhat EL 6 comes with 5.1.4 and it probably has a long lifetime ahead of it.

How hard/painful would it be to install Lua 5.2.x? (I don't know the answer - just asking)
It's a tiny little library compared to most of Wireshark's others, fwiw.

-hadriel

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault