Home page logo
/

wireshark logo Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: GIT tutorials (was: Re: Fix bug in GSM MAP, have problems with GIT)
From: Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:49:22 -0400

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

On Mar 11, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Evan Huus <eapache () gmail com> wrote:

Not technically true. If I make a commit with SHA x, push it, and it
gets submitted, then it is true that the final SHA in master will be y
!= x. However, the next time I pull then I will get SHA y as well.
They x and y technically reference different commits, since y contains
additional information about who reviewed it, when it was submitted
from Gerrit, etc.

And if you use the Git Swiss Army Sledgehammer, a/k/a "git rebase", you can get rid of the commit with SHA x or, at 
least, not have it clutter your logs (as well as getting rid of all those silly merges Git forces you to do in some 
cases).  That's one reason why the "git rebase" in my "git update" script:

        git stash; git pull; git rebase; git stash pop

is handy.

Or if you do development in branches as is fairly common, you can just
delete the old branch.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault