Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe?
From: Dave Roberts <dave.roberts () saaconsultants com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 09:46:43 +0000 (GMT)
On Wed, 10 Dec 1997 daemond () ibm net wrote:
APOP uses an encrypted password, but does this change from session to session? If not then APOP is not really much more secure than regular POP
Yes, it does change for each session. A better phrase is hashed password, as opposed to encrypted password. When the client connects to the server, the server offers a string in the greeting line, looks something like:- +OK QPOP (version 2.41beta1) at pop3.saaconsultants.com starting. <2205.881746763 () pop3 saaconsultants com> The bit in angle brackets changes, and is a combination of time & PID, I think. This string is MD5'd with the users password, and that hash is sent down the line. Now, if a bad person is monitoring the line, they will see the greeting line anyway, and therefore this gives limited protection as that person can feed the 'seed' into their brute force cracker, but it does protect against casual sniffers, and replay attacks.
shell or ftp access using that persons account (provided that no one figures out how to decrypt an encrypted APOP password).
Source code and documentation are available, if you have the spare CPU cycles, I'm sure it can be done eventually. Yet another good reason for changing passwords regularly. -- Dave Roberts For PGP Key - send mail with subject of 'get pgp':- Firewall Chappie =51 4B 6A 35 3F C4 B6 3D 13 88 0C B2 48 61 51 1C= SAA Consultants Ltd Std disclaimer applies, it's nothing to do with them
Current thread:
- APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe? Marc Goldburg (Dec 08)
- Re: APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe? Dave Roberts (Dec 09)
- Re: APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe? daemond (Dec 11)
- Re: APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe? Dave Roberts (Dec 11)
- Re: APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe? daemond (Dec 11)
- Re: APOP and qpopper2.4, how safe? Dave Roberts (Dec 09)
