Received: from relay.pch.gc.ca ([167.33.1.4]) by pch.gc.ca (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999)) with SMTP id 85256785.00230A7D; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 02:22:44 -0400
Received: from gate.pch.gc.ca (gate.pch.gc.ca [167.33.1.1]) by relay.pch.gc.ca (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA22848 for <Bill_Royds@pch.gc.ca>; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 02:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from point.pch.gc.ca ([167.33.21.4]) by gate.pch.gc.ca
          via smtpd (for relay.pch.gc.ca [167.33.1.4]) with SMTP; 3 Jun 1999 06:22:42 UT
Received: from nfr.net (tower.nfr.net [208.196.145.10])
	by point.pch.gc.ca (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09753
	for <Bill_Royds@pch.gc.ca>; Thu, 3 Jun 1999 02:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from lists@localhost)
	by nfr.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03979
	for firewall-wizards-outgoing; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 19:05:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from fwiz@localhost)
	by nfr.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA03800
	for firewall-wizards@nfr.net; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 17:40:25 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ns.rnl.ist.utl.pt (ns.rnl.ist.utl.pt [193.136.164.1])
	by nfr.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA00222
	for <firewall-wizards@nfr.net>; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:18:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt (IDENT:35129@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt [193.136.164.11])
	by ns.rnl.ist.utl.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09837
	for <firewall-wizards@nfr.net>; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:24:00 +0100
Received: from localhost by camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA10015
	for <firewall-wizards@nfr.net>; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:21:27 +0100 (WET DST)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 15:21:26 +0100 (WET DST)
From: pmsac <pmsac@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt>
To: firewall-wizards@nfr.net
Subject: SMTP relay tests
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9906021512500.21358-100000@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-firewall-wizards@nfr.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: pmsac <pmsac@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt>


	Hello,

	In the company I work for, I'm getting, from time to time,
	mails from something like FROM:xpto@domain RCPT:relaytest@domain.
	Namely, I got this test originating @manawatu.co.nz, which tested
	thouroughly,  with empty sender, uucp style, et al...

	What are these people motivations ? E-Commerce spamming ?
	Trying to get some kind of anonimity ? It's starting to get
	on my nerves.

	--
	Cavaca, P.
	pmsac@camoes.rnl.ist.utl.pt

