Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: regarding spam...
From: Jubilation T Cornpone <j_t_cornpone () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:49:14 -0600
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:45:01 -0500, "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr () nfr com> wrote:
So, a side effect of this approach is a 'web of trust' with respect to noise email. :) Suppose I tell the mail system "I trust Dodge Mumford's judgement regarding what is spam" then my mail system will automatically move into my spam folder all emails that Dodge moves into his spam folder. We might choose to look out for eachother in a reflexive relationship, or we might choose to additionally trust an outside source, etc, etc.
This is kind of what brightmail.com does for $$$. The problem, as I
see it, is having the time to put eyeballs on the spam one receives.
You might want to look into rsync'ing (if you're running sendmail or
postfix) with Ben Grimm's spam list, which gets updated at least 48
times per day. See:
http://basic.wirehub.nl/spamlist-usage.html
--
Jubilation T Cornpone
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () nfr com
http://list.nfr.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- regarding spam... Marcus J. Ranum (Mar 29)
- Re: regarding spam... Ryan Russell (Mar 29)
- Re: regarding spam... Alberto Begliomini (Mar 29)
- Re: regarding spam... John Adams (Mar 30)
- Re: regarding spam... Jubilation T Cornpone (Mar 29)
- Re: regarding spam... Adam Shostack (Mar 29)
- Re: regarding spam... Robert Graham (Mar 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: regarding spam... Max Enders (Mar 29)
- Re: regarding spam... Antonomasia (Mar 30)
