Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: OpenBSD pf users?
From: "Wim Lamotte" <Wim.Lamotte () UHasselt be>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:32:14 +0100
Hi all, Thanks for all the feedback, it's much appreciated! To Robby: yes, we do have *nix wizards (and luckily more than one, so leaving is not that much of an issue). We are running OpenVPN for some time now (we're cutting the SecureClient users off before the end of the year, because OpenVPN is much more flexible). We're also experienced in setting up monitoring with mrtg, cacti, etc. In summary, I think we can do most of the stuff you say with our eyes closed. ;-) Regarding SmartDefense and content inspection: this is indeed something we would lose in our transition to pf. But nothing prevents us from adding application proxies, of course. To Matthew: our PPS and throughput requirements are relatively moderate, mostly since our outside line is rather limited (8 Mbps). As far as we have seen from pf documentation and fora, the performance is way beyond our needs. Thanks for the links to the pf fora. To Paul: it's good to hear that we're not the only ones doing the transition from CP FW-1 to pf! ;-) Thanks again, Wim
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- OpenBSD pf users? Wim Lamotte (Dec 11)
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? ArkanoiD (Dec 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? Jim O'Gorman (Dec 11)
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? Paul Melson (Dec 11)
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? Joshua Hill (Dec 11)
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? Matthew Franz (Dec 11)
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? Robby Cauwerts (Dec 12)
- Re: OpenBSD pf users? Wim Lamotte (Dec 12)
