nanog mailing list archives
Re: a multihomed net
From: Ed Kern <ejk () digex net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 15:46:42 -0400
On October 22, you wrote:
Today I multihomed a customer using only two disjoint PA spaces.
PA1 PA2
P1---=---Wall---=---P2
|
------ RFC1597
|
Server
so is anything in the above picture directly addressable through the wall?...and paul you mean rfc1918 right? ;)
I did this whole thing with an almost-stock BSD/OS 2.1 system (other than the "socket" command which is off the net from way back.)
server...?...just do the nat with your cissssccoooo... http://schizo.digex.net Easy to install, and it works....if people will want to use it....thats a different matter... Id like to hear opinions on this at nanog if people have any..
So don't let's talk any longer about multihoming requiring PI space.
Either way...firewall or just with the router..you are correct. Ed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- a multihomed net Zachary DeAquila (Oct 21)
- Re: a multihomed net Paul A Vixie (Oct 22)
- Re: a multihomed net Miguel A.L. Paraz (Oct 23)
- Re: a multihomed net Ed Kern (Oct 23)
- Re: a multihomed net Tony Li (Oct 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: a multihomed net Paul Ferguson (Oct 23)
- Re: a multihomed net Miguel A.L. Paraz (Oct 24)
- Re: a multihomed net Paul A Vixie (Oct 22)
