nanog mailing list archives
Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth
From: Jonathan Lassoff <jof () thejof com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:44:05 -0800
I would argue that collapsing all of your policy evaluation and routing for a size/zone/area/whatever into one box is actually somewhat detrimental to stability (and consequently, security to a certain extent). Cramming every little feature under the sun into one appliance makes for great glossy brochures and Powerpoint decks, but I just don't think it's practical. Take a LAMP hosting operation for example. Which will scale the furthest to handle the most amount of traffic and stateful sessions: iptables and snort on each multi-core server, or one massive central box with some interface hardware and Cavium Octeons. If built properly, my money's on the distributed setup. Cheers, jof
Current thread:
- Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Holmes,David A (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth -Hammer- (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth JAMES MCMURRY (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Tim Eberhard (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth JAMES MCMURRY (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth David Swafford (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Jonathan Lassoff (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Justin M. Streiner (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Paul Graydon (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Robert Brockway (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Dobbins, Roland (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth Mark Tinka (Dec 06)
- Re: Internet Edge and Defense in Depth -Hammer- (Dec 06)
