nanog mailing list archives
Re: local_preference for transit traffic?
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 15:49:46 -0500
I've had similar experiences to Mr. Petach. Depending on order of operations, you can look at this from a different prospective as well -- why go with a soulless entity for your transit (or transport, collocation, ...) requirements, when you can "keep it in the family" and engage a peer who already understands your service model and is committed to maintaining mutual benefit? Indeed, the old adage of "once a customer, never a peer" could never be wronger. -a
Current thread:
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic?, (continued)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Leo Bicknell (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 15)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Keegan Holley (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Jeff Wheeler (Dec 14)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 17)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Matthew Petach (Dec 17)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Adam Rothschild (Dec 17)
- Re: local_preference for transit traffic? Mark Tinka (Dec 18)
