nanog mailing list archives
Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!
From: Joe Hamelin <joe () nethead com>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:10:26 -0800
From: "Vitkovsky, Adam" <avitkovsky () emea att com> -also there some attempts to actually send the information 50 micro sec
back in time Please don't let the high-frequency stock traders get a hold of this. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
Current thread:
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet!, (continued)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Ray Soucy (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Aiden Sullivan (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vitkovsky, Adam (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Vadim Antonov (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 30)
- RE: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Robert Bonomi (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jay Ashworth (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Joe Hamelin (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Tom Limoncelli (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Jared Mauch (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! David Barak (Dec 30)
- Re: next-best-transport! down with ethernet! Darius Jahandarie (Dec 29)