nanog mailing list archives
Re: NIST IPv6 document
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:57:20 -0600
On 1/6/2011 9:52 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
In the DHCP case this is easy, yes. I perfer to have only LL on the link towards the customer operated CPE, thus I don't really need to keep lots of ND state per customer.
I use RBE and unnumbered vlans in most areas, which keeps some state, but effectively prohibits the problem, as well as other problems. I have vendors curse me for wanting the router to handle the security instead of their DSLAMs, but then their DSLAMs often broke IPv6 with their so called security.
Jack
Current thread:
- Re: NIST IPv6 document, (continued)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Wheeler (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Joe Greco (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jack Bates (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Lamar Owen (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jima (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Jeff Kell (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document John Levine (Jan 05)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Julien Goodwin (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Dobbins, Roland (Jan 06)
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Owen DeLong (Jan 06)
- Message not available
- Re: NIST IPv6 document Tim Chown (Jan 07)
