Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

["Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>]

On Jan 13, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Jack Bates wrote:

> The proxy capabilities of the firewall are additional security measures on top of the NAT (and definitely should be 
> deployed for their higher security value).

Not in front of servers, they shouldn't - because they have a negative security value in that context.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

             Sell your computer and buy a guitar.