nanog mailing list archives
Re: Request Spamhaus contact
From: Andrew Kirch <trelane () trelane net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 16:23:48 -0500
I'm not Spamhaus. I don't necessarily agree with their listing policies, but reading your SBL record, http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/sbl.lasso?query=SBL100691, it appears that someone from your ISP has been in contact with Spamhaus, and were less than thorough in removing the spam gang you guys signed on (PTR records?), or were less than honest about removing them in the first place. For the rest of my life I will mentally equate "DDoS protection solutions" with "foonet". It hasn't failed me since 2001, and doesn't seem to fail me today. Andrew On 1/17/2011 3:15 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
Someone at Spamhaus please contact me concerning your second consecutive preemptive strike against our IP space. Fun Fact: No one at Spamhaus has ever successfully sent us an abuse complaint. Also, some rocket scientist decided that their sbl-removals@ box should also filter e-mail so blocked parties can't even get in touch. As such, it will be necessary to reply to jeffrey.lyon () gmail com vs. @blacklotus.net . You claim to monitor sbl-removals@ but it seems i've been ignored for several hours.
Current thread:
- Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Andrew Kirch (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Tom Hill (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Herrin (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact William Pitcock (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Jeffrey Lyon (Jan 17)
- Re: Request Spamhaus contact Andrew Kirch (Jan 17)
