Re: ouch..

[Scott Morris <swm () emanon com>]

Now just where would the fun in THAT be?  ;)

Scott

On 9/14/11 11:00 AM, James Jones wrote:
> Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com> wrote:
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Always Learning [mailto:nanog () u61 u22 net]
> > > Sent: 14 September 2011 14:39
> > > To: N. Max Pierson
> > > Cc: nanog () nanog org
> > > Subject: Re: ouch..
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
> > >
> > > > Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
> > > > fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
> > > > somewhere for some feedback :)
> > > Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > With best regards,
> > >
> > > Paul.
> > > England,
> > > EU.
> >
> > Lies? So who has 100G MX series cards then..?
> >
> > --
> > Leigh
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
> > ______________________________________________________________________