nanog mailing list archives
Re: Network Traffic Collection
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:52:23 +0100
On 2012-02-23 21:34 , Mike Lyon wrote:
Random thought, anyone ever used Splunk for this kind of thing?
Various folks have, the problem of course comes down to processing power, thus you'll need to throw a lot of hardware against it to be able to process traffic in a decent network. Check http://www.raffy.ch/ and http://pixlcloud.com/ etc for more details about this. Greets, Jeroen
Current thread:
- Network Traffic Collection Maverick (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Jeroen Massar (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Maverick (Feb 23)
- RE: Network Traffic Collection Matlock, Kenneth L (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Mukom Akong T. (Feb 24)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Maverick (Feb 25)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Maverick (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Suresh Rajagopalan (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Mike Lyon (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Jason Lixfeld (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Jeroen Massar (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Mike Lyon (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Jeroen Massar (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Justin M. Streiner (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Peter Phaal (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Carlos Alcantar (Feb 23)
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Owen DeLong (Feb 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Network Traffic Collection Scott Weeks (Feb 23)
