nanog mailing list archives
Re: US DOJ victim letter
From: Ryan Pavely <paradox () nac net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:43:28 -0500
I really enjoyed the fact that I called the number, on what I learned later was a "Sample", and when I picked the option to speak with an agent I got "The mailbox is full" message. I feel safe...
Ryan Pavely Director Research And Development Net Access Corporation http://www.nac.net/ On 01/31/2012 7:38 PM, Phil Dyer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jon Lewis<jlewis () lewis org> wrote:On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:Bit odd, if it's a phish. Even more odd if it's actually from the Fed.It's definitely real, but seems like they're handling it as incompetently as possible.Yep. That sounds about right. Man, I'm feeling left out. I kinda want one now. phil
Current thread:
- Re: US DOJ victim letter, (continued)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Martin Hannigan (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter bmanning (Jan 28)
- Message not available
- Re: US DOJ victim letter John Peach (Jan 28)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Ryan Gelobter (Jan 28)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Jon Lewis (Jan 27)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Jack Bates (Jan 30)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Matthew S. Crocker (Jan 30)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 31)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Phil Dyer (Jan 31)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Ryan Pavely (Jan 31)
- RE: US DOJ victim letter Ronald Bonica (Jan 31)
- Re: US DOJ victim letter Carlos Alcantar (Jan 31)
